Philosophy Dictionary of ArgumentsHome
| |||
|
| |||
| Radical interpretation, philosophy: is an expression for a family of thought experiments, which has the object of the translation of a completely foreign language into the language of the interpreter, which the interpreter does not understand at all. See also translation, indeterminacy, Gavagai._____________Annotation: The above characterizations of concepts are neither definitions nor exhausting presentations of problems related to them. Instead, they are intended to give a short introduction to the contributions below. – Lexicon of Arguments. | |||
| Author | Concept | Summary/Quotes | Sources |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Rudolf Carnap on Radical Interpretation - Dictionary of Arguments
VII 146 Radical Interpretation/RI/Translation/Field Linguist/Carnap: Key point: first it is discovered that certain objects are designated by a given word (extension), then the intension is discovered (what natives understand by it). Extension before intension - order. 1) positive E.: attribute 2) negative E. (deny) 3) indefinite cases. It is still possible to attribute different intensions to the thus extensionally fixed predicates! Because there can be different properties, for which the extension of the predicate has been determined. ((s) Ex (s) if all considered dogs are brown, it is not clear whether the color or the animals were singled out. - Furthermore, "gloeb" could refer to four-footedness thus covering the entire extension. ChisholmVsCarnap: this does not take into account while any mistakes of the speaker or uncertainty.) >Reference, >Unambiguity, >Identification, >Individuation, >Properties, >Extension, >Intension._____________Explanation of symbols: Roman numerals indicate the source, arabic numerals indicate the page number. The corresponding books are indicated on the right hand side. ((s)…): Comment by the sender of the contribution. Translations: Dictionary of Arguments The note [Concept/Author], [Author1]Vs[Author2] or [Author]Vs[term] resp. "problem:"/"solution:", "old:"/"new:" and "thesis:" is an addition from the Dictionary of Arguments. If a German edition is specified, the page numbers refer to this edition. |
Ca I R. Carnap Die alte und die neue Logik In Wahrheitstheorien, G. Skirbekk (Hg), Frankfurt 1996 Ca II R. Carnap Philosophie als logische Syntax In Philosophie im 20.Jahrhundert, Bd II, A. Hügli/P.Lübcke (Hg), Reinbek 1993 Ca IV R. Carnap Mein Weg in die Philosophie Stuttgart 1992 Ca IX Rudolf Carnap Wahrheit und Bewährung. Actes du Congrès International de Philosophie Scientifique fasc. 4, Induction et Probabilité, Paris, 1936 In Wahrheitstheorien, Gunnar Skirbekk, Frankfurt/M. 1977 Ca VI R. Carnap Der Logische Aufbau der Welt Hamburg 1998 CA VII = PiS R. Carnap Sinn und Synonymität in natürlichen Sprachen In Zur Philosophie der idealen Sprache, J. Sinnreich (Hg), München 1982 Ca VIII (= PiS) R. Carnap Über einige Begriffe der Pragmatik In Zur Philosophie der idealen Sprache, J. Sinnreich (Hg), München 1982 |
||
> Counter arguments against Carnap
> Counter arguments in relation to Radical Interpretation
Ed. Martin Schulz, access date 2024-04-28